It seems certain that Islam Liberals could not accept the fact that they are no better than animals (heat too strong for you, lady?), and so they decided to come up with this example of a straw man argument and poisoning the well. Its strange how they simply go off the tangent and fall short of being ballistic when The Islamoholic points out the fallacy of their unethical lifestyle. Its even stranger still when the issue of rape and incest were raised, although The Islamoholic was not discussing those things in the first place (that, I feel, is for another time).
Do they really believe that animal sex = fornication = incest = rape? Because while I have no problems embracing that equation, I’m not sure whether you do. Air-headed liberal female, just because you have the word Dick in your blog title does not make you a male.
But I’m sorry, dear, did you dislike your act of copulation with your partner(s) out of wedlock to be described (and be equated with that of) as animal sex? Silly me, I guess I should not be relying on logic then and start preaching the “fire and brimstone” verses in the Qur’an about adutery and fornication. That would make it easier for you to call yours truly a “fundie”. Right? Because I can easily do that too.
Hell hath no fury like an Islam Liberal scorned?
Indeed, Allah Almighty is the Final Arbitrator of our actions and certainly, those who disobey Him has only one final destination. Of that, I bear witness. Believe it.
June 12th, 2007 at 4:48 pm
You say :
‘Silly me, I guess I should not be relying on logic then and start preaching the “fire and brimstone†verses in the Qur’an about adutery and fornication’
and i think you mean this as logic (im gonna leave your attacks on these ‘islam liberals’ aside and focus on your logic):
Proposition 1: Animals have sexual relations without the sanctity of marriage.
Proposition 2: Islam Liberals have sexual relations without the sanctity of marriage.
Conclusion: Islam Liberals are the equivalent of animals.
I dont mean to piss you off, but following this line of reasoning, if I dont brush my teeth on a monday and all the gorillas in the world dont brush theirs either does that make me equal to an animal?
Im sure you probably mean that brushing teeth can never be equated with something as serious and with as much magnitude as fornication, which i agree with, (and my personal opinion is that people should reserve their sex for true life partners) is it really correct to equate them right away to animals merely because you decree that such behaviour is similar ‘enough’ to animals? Then where does this line lie? What I mean to ask you is, are you actually telling us that your brand of reasoning automatically makes them the equivalent of animals? That you get to decide when they are and when they arent acting like animals? I understand that despite me trying to be as impartial as possible you may think i am not, but i ask you for the sake of your honour not to immediately start attacking me but to answer my questions first
July 28th, 2007 at 3:44 pm
[...] this criticism. Oh wait, that’s not the only one. See this, this and this as well. And guess who has been supporting and cheering her on all this while in her [...]