The Islamoholic remembers the days when she was in SMKA (P) Al-Mashoor. Particularly one subject that I found much to my liking were the ilmu mantik lessons which you learn in…guess where…mathematics class. Later in life, I found out that those logic lessons that I took all those years ago can be applied to strengthen your arguments. Particularly when you deal with hardcore liberal idiots who prefer to bonk their partners in bed without the sanctity of marriage (it makes no difference whether you change partners or you stick to one partner, you are still no better than an animal when copulating out of wedlock).
And STDs (Sexually-Transmitted Disease) from a toilet seat? Bwahahahaha….you must be kidding me! That is why you must have taken up that lousy and boring technical job, because you didn’t have the brains to take up medical studies.
Through a series of logical propositions, I shall seek to demonstrate and conclude that the Islam Liberals are the human equivalent of their counterparts in the animal kingdom.
Proposition 1: Humans marry their partners and commit themselves to sexual relations in marriage.
Proposition 2: Animals have sexual relations without the sanctity of marriage.
Conclusion: Ethical humans who marry are not animals.
Proposition 1: Humans who marry and have sexual relations within marriage are ethical humans.
Proposition 2: Islam Liberals have sexual relations without the sanctity of marriage.
Conclusion: Islam Liberals are not ethical humans.
Proposition 1: Animals have sexual relations without the sanctity of marriage.
Proposition 2: Islam Liberals have sexual relations without the sanctity of marriage.
Conclusion: Islam Liberals are the equivalent of animals.
I love math. Don’t you?
June 12th, 2007 at 2:30 pm
[...] like certain Islam Liberals could not accept the fact that they are no better than animals, and so they decided to come up with this example of strawman [...]
June 12th, 2007 at 3:02 pm
[...] that was the case. You sure were in ecstasy when you tried to “exploit” a loophole in my logic and then try to equate the premise of “ethical humans” with those “happily [...]
June 12th, 2007 at 3:31 pm
Proposition 2: Animals have sexual relations without the sanctity of marriage.
1. Animals can’t get married.
2. Animals are not required to get married.
3. Animals were never commanded to get married.
4. Animals don’t get punished for sexual relations without marriage.
In essence, animals are not held in any way to the standards of humans, thus attempting to equivocate the fact that animals have relations “outside the sanctity of marriage” to people having sex “outside the sanctiy of marriage” thus making them animals is non analogous due to apples and oranges not being the same thing.
June 12th, 2007 at 11:33 pm
These sort of simplistic and erroneous logic statements can also be used to prove that a cow is a pig.
Proposition 1 - A cow is a 4-legged mammal
Proposition 2 - A pig is s 4-legged mammal
Conclusion - A cow is a pig.
You may love math, but you suck at logical thinking.