It is well-known that the Islam Liberals, since the advent of Islam, had existed for the sole purpose of decimating Islam and the Islamic ideology systematically from within the body of the ummah. This campaign began with the the “spiritual founder” of the munaafiqun, Abdullah ibn Ubayy. It was known to the Prophet Muhammad salla allahu alayhi wassallam that Abdullah ibn Ubayy was not in the least bit interested to championing the cause of Islam and work towards its imminent victory over other corrupted ideologies. Rather, Abdullah ibn Ubayy was secretly cohorting with the enemies of Islam and abetting them, exploiting every weakness that was made available and relished the day when he would defeat Islam with the help of its enemies.
Needless to mention, that ambition did not come to pass and Abdullah ibn Ubayy died a broken man. As God would will it, his son, Abdullah bin Abdullah ibn Ubayy was a pious and zealous Muslim, exhorting Islam and its virtues and work towards its promotion side by side with Rasulullah salla allahu alayhi wassallam.
What is Islamophobia and how does one define Islamophobia? This is the question that may appear in one’s mind. However, Islamophobia may be defined as follows, in not too many words:
Islamophobia is the irrational fear and/or hatred of Islam, Muslims or Islamic culture. Islamophobia can be characterised by the belief that all or most Muslims are religious fanatics, have violent tendencies towards non-Muslims, and reject as directly opposed to Islam such concepts as equality, tolerance, and democracy.
This view is common after the 9/11 tragedy where Muslims have been regarded in myopic terms. It is viewed as a new form of racism whereby Muslims, an ethno-religious group, not a race, are nevertheless constructed as a race. Your writings reflect this tendency to paint Muslims with the brush of racism and intolerance. The irony is that a liberal Muslim, one who has abandoned the Qur’an and the Sunnah for the cultural decadence of Westernisation and secularism is seen as a “moderate”. Who defines these labels, “moderate” or “extemist”, “fanatic” or “progressive”, anyway?
The Islamoholic openly rejects your hatred of true Muslims and vehemently opposes your definition of what defines a “Muslim”.
It seems that some unintended targets decided to say their piece. But kaafirs should be seen and not heard. That is my opinion.
I was already filled in about this character by a Muslim brother, an avowed internet activist, so I think I know everything there is to know about this character. But this blog is about exposing the ideology of the Islam Liberals, and only about them.
The Islamoholic is neither interested in nor will The Islamoholic would ever want to discuss about the doctrines of any religious belief system (hence referred to as “RBS”) apart from Islam. I pointed out the hypocrisy of the Islam Liberals in the exaltation of another culture apart from Islam and that was it. Needless to mention, the Islam Liberals remain as silent as the grave and as of to date, no real answer was given to the question (see bolded question).
Refer to the About page to get an idea of my mission statement.